Robert W. McChesney received his
communications PhD at the University of Washington in 1989 and worked in the School
of Journalism and Mass Communications at UW-Madison from 1988 to 1998 (Department
of Communication, 2014). In 2002 he co-founded the “national media reform
organization” Free Press and served
as the company’s president until 2008; however, he is still active as one of
the Board of Directors. Currently, McChesney works as the communications
professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His scholarly
articles mainly focus on how new media affects both “democratic and political
societies.” McChesney’s chapter entitled “How Can the Political Economy of
Communication Help Us Understand the Internet?” addresses America’s communication
critical juncture and how we as a society need to be aware of the issues so we
can petition public participation in the policy making process.
The chapter begins by talking about
the Political Economy of Communication (PEC). The organization’s duty is to impartially
decide if new media and communication affect societal power. Here, McChesney (2013)
mentions the term “critical junctures” (p. 66). This phenomenon occurs when there
is some sort of revolution that impacts society and can strike political controversy
and social discontent. Today, McChesney suggests that America is in a communication critical juncture in which
the digital age, the free market and the journalism industry are all topics of
discussion.
When talking about digital society,
McChesney (2013) questions if the Internet will conceive the “fourth great
communication transformation in history” (p. 70). He refers to how speech and
language, writing and the printing press were the first three greatest
communication tools invented. Society obviously heavily depends on these basic
forms of communication, so just imagine the new form of communication
technology could create. Technology has already contributed to how
advertisements are produced and distributed. I believe McChesney’s point was to
explain how digital media will continue to engulf society’s juncture and the
affects can be both good and bad.
Another term McChesney mentions is
the free market. He illustrates how the entertainment media system is heavily
dependable on the government. The government provides policies and regulations
to level the industrial playing field, supports the media financially
especially with advertisements, and firmly enforces copyright laws. Though the
government greatly regulates the media industry, the new digital age has been
somewhat of a negative factor. The ease of illegally downloading and sharing
files and ignoring all of the pop-up advertisements online is a large financial
barrier for the economy, which is why the PEC is needed to create laws.
McChesney lastly addresses
journalism and its crucial relevance. Journalism must report a wide variety of
legitimate news that has the strength and support to stand up to the
government. It is an excellent source of political information and
participation. The problem is that journalism industry is greedy when it comes
to saving money. Journalists are relying too heavily on “people in power”
(McChesney, 2013, p. 88). This decreases the arguments as well as the cost to
produce and publish news. Plus, the public relations news is insistent on
giving reporters information on their clients. This saves even more money and
attracts a larger audience. The new technologies only allow quicker spread of
information.
In the end, the PEC must evaluate
all of these considerations and develop rules in order to regulate the growing
and powerful media industries by applying laws. The public will have no say in
what the new policies will be, which is why McChesney brings up his Free Press
organization. McChesney wants to inform his readers the importance of demanding
participation in these policy rules. The digital age is upon us and affects
everyone, so why should we allow the government to essentially take control of
technology without any opinions from the general public?
Work Cited
Department of Communication. (2014). Robert W. McChesney. [Online]. Available at
<http://www.communication.illinois.edu/people/rwmcches>
[Accessed 14 October 2014]
McChesney, R.W. (2013). How Can the Political Economy of
Communication Help Us
Understand the Internet? Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism is Turning
the Internet Against Democracy (pp. 63-95). New York, New York: The New Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.